The years 1910 to 1914 mark a
period of profound innovation in the history of art. In 1910, Roger Fry
coined “Post-Impressionism” on the occasion of the exhibition Manet and the Post-Impressionists, and in doing so introduced
modernist
styles to London. Cubism, with its fractured and faceted subjects,
achieved full recognition in Paris by
1912, and the movement sparked
new artistic directions in France, Italy, the Netherlands, and Russia.
The more
expressionistic manifestations of art were at an equally
radical stage in Germany and Austria; Vasily Kandinsky
wrote his
seminal treatise On the Spiritual
in Art in late 1911 (published
1912) and abstraction took hold. By 1914,
the rapid acceleration of
modernist production had reached a crescendo that was largely
squelched—along with
the international spirit that in many ways
defined prewar modernism—by the onset of war.
Displaying
over one hundred paintings, sculptures, and works on paper, The Great Upheaval: Modern Art from the
Guggenheim
Collection, 1910–1918 explores
the simultaneity of artistic phenomenon across national borders and
the
increasing breakdown of representational elements in favor of
abstraction. Artists including Georges Braque,
Umberto Boccioni,
Robert Delaunay, Marcel Duchamp, Kandinsky, Fernand Léger, Kazimir
Malevich, Franz Marc,
Piet Mondrian, and Pablo Picasso provide ample
evidence of the richness and complexity of production during
these
pivotal years leading up to World War I.
Perhaps the
most important innovation that emerged from the School of Paris was
Cubism, whose leading
practitioners were Braque and Picasso. Paul
Cézanne’s geometrized compositions largely inspired them to use
the
simplified and faceted forms, along with the flattened spatial planes,
that came to be associated with the initial
phase known as Analytic
Cubism. The technique blossomed with stunning rapidity and led to
further artistic
experimentation among the Parisian avant-garde.
Delaunay and Léger, for instance, both explored fragmentation
and
simultaneity of both perception and the passage of time through their
dynamic presentations of largely urban
subject matter.
In a stylistic idiom that integrated Cubist and
Divisionist techniques, the Italian Futurists glorified the energy
and
speed of modern life together with the dynamism and violence of the new
technological society. Founded by
Filippo Tommaso Marinetti and
including such artists as Giacomo Balla and Gino Severini, the movement
sought
to represent the experience of the modern metropolis—namely,
the overstimulation of the individual’s senses—by
portraying multiple
phases of motion simultaneously as well as the interpenetration of
objects and their
environment through superimposing different
chromatic planes.
Almost in tandem with Italian
Futurism, Malevich developed a Russian version, and described most of
his work
from 1912 to 1915 as “Cubo-Futurist.” This Cubist
fragmentation of space allied to the Futurist synchronicity of
shifting
forms was taken up briefly by Natalia Goncharova, Mikhail Larionov,
Liubov Popova, and other members
of the Russian avant-garde.
Moreover, in 1911 Larionov developed a personal abstract style later
known as
Rayonism, which placed an emphasis on dynamic, linear light
rays.
In Germany and Austria, artists such as Kandinsky, Marc,
and Egon Schiele pioneered Expressionism, a very
elastic concept that
refers to art that emphasizes the extreme expressive properties of
pictorial form in order
to explore subjective emotions and inner
psychological truths. Although much influenced by the work of Paul
Gauguin,
Edvard Munch, and Vincent van Gogh, the Expressionists departed even
further from traditional
notions of recording the appearance of
reality than had the Post-Impressionists or the Symbolists.
The growth of modernist groups, and the unprecedented output
of artist manifestos and treatises, played a
significant role in the
spread of these radically new approaches to artmaking. Likewise, just
as one could freely
travel in Europe without a passport during this
time, so too were ideas transported across borders; many artists
collaborated
and exhibited with colleagues outside of their native countries. The Great Upheaval
will therefore
offer a chronological survey of the period, as
opposed to organizing by movement or country.
The
exhibition’s title not only captures the artistic dynamism of the
period, as artists increasingly experimented
with fractured surfaces,
but also evokes the destruction and disillusionment ushered in with
World War I. The title
is specifically inspired by “Die grosse
Umwälzung” (The Great Revolution/Upheaval), a text that was included
in
an announcement for the first Der Blaue Reiter (the Blue Rider) group
exhibition around December 1911.
Kandinsky and Marc, two artists
whose work is integral to the museum’s Solomon R. Guggenheim Founding
Collection,
organized Der Blaue Reiter in late 1911. Revealing their
internationalist spirit, the artists invited many
colleagues from
outside of Germany to participate in their groundbreaking exhibitions in
Munich. It is thus fitting
that this presentation tracing the
cross-pollination of ideas in the 1910s should also mark the occasion of
the onehundredth
anniversary of Der Blue Reiter. As The Great Upheaval
will attest, this was indeed not a time marked by
imitation but
rather a moment of collaboration, interchange, synthesis, and, above
all, radical innovation.
The
Great Upheaval is curated by
Tracey Bashkoff, Curator of Collections and Exhibitions, and Megan
Fontanella,
Assistant Curator of Collections and Provenance.
This exhibition is supported by a grant from the Joseph and
Sylvia Slifka Foundation.