Collection Online
Browse By
Browse By Museum
Browse By Major Acquisition
Plan Your Visit
Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum
1071 Fifth Avenue
(at 89th Street)
New York, NY 10128-0173
Purchase tickets
Hours & Ticketing
Holiday & Extended Hours
Sun 10 am–8 pm
Mon 10 am–8 pm*
Tue 10 am–5:45 pm**
Wed 10 am–5:45 pm
Thu CLOSED except for
Dec 27, 10 am–5:45 pm
Fri 10 am–5:45 pm
Sat 10 am–7:45 pm
*Monday, December 24 and 31, 10 am–5:45 pm
**Tuesday, December 25, CLOSED and January 1, 11 am–6 pm
See Plan Your Visit for more information on extended hours.
Admission
Adults $22
Students and Seniors (65 years +) with valid ID $18
Children 12 and under Free
Members Free
Audio Tours
Audio tours are free with admission.
Further information:
Directions to the museum
Group sales
Restaurants
Send a personalized greeting today!
White Cross (Weisses Kreuz), January–June 1922. Oil on canvas, 39 9/16 x 43 9/16 inches (100.5 x 110.6 cm). The Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation,Peggy Guggenheim Collection, Venice 76.2553.34. © 2012 Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York/ADAGP, Paris
Vasily Kandinsky referred to the early 1920s as his “cool period.” From this time geometric shapes became increasingly prevalent in his work, often floating in front of or within a broad plane, as in White Cross. Here straight lines and circles offset looser, organic forms and irregularly geometric shapes. A corresponding variation of brushstroke produces highly active passages contrasting with less inflected areas. Some shapes may have their distant origins in a naturalistic vocabulary of forms. Thus, the fishlike crescent and the lancing black diagonal that crosses it, which appear also in the related Red Oval of 1920 (Collection Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum, New York), may recall the boat with oars in earlier works. However, the motifs are stripped of their representational meaning and do not contribute to an interpretation of the whole in terms of realistic content.
The title isolates a detail of the composition, the white cross at upper right, a formal consequence of the checkerboard pattern (a recurrent motif in works of this period). In this instance negative space is treated as positive form. Once the cross of the title is seen, one begins to perceive throughout the work a proliferation of others, varying in degrees of explicitness. Though Kandinsky, like Kazimir Malevich, uses it as an abstract element, the cross is an evocative, symbolic form.
The viewer’s compulsion to read imagery literally is used to unexpected ends by Kandinsky, who includes two signs resembling the numeral 3 upended and affixed to directional arrows. The variations in direction of the resulting forms suggest the rotation of the entire canvas. The antigravitational feeling of floating forms and the placement of elements on a planar support against an indefinite background in White Cross reveal affinities with Malevich’s Suprematist works.
Lucy Flint



