Collection Online
Browse By
Browse By Museum
Browse By Major Acquisition
Plan Your Visit
Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum
1071 Fifth Avenue
(at 89th Street)
New York, NY 10128-0173
Purchase tickets
Hours & Ticketing
Holiday & Extended Hours
Sun 10 am–8 pm
Mon 10 am–8 pm*
Tue 10 am–5:45 pm**
Wed 10 am–5:45 pm
Thu CLOSED except for
Dec 27, 10 am–5:45 pm
Fri 10 am–5:45 pm
Sat 10 am–7:45 pm
*Monday, December 24 and 31, 10 am–5:45 pm
**Tuesday, December 25, CLOSED and January 1, 11 am–6 pm
See Plan Your Visit for more information on extended hours.
Admission
Adults $22
Students and Seniors (65 years +) with valid ID $18
Children 12 and under Free
Members Free
Audio Tours
Audio tours are free with admission.
Further information:
Directions to the museum
Group sales
Restaurants
Send a personalized greeting today!
Ocean Greyness, 1953. Oil on canvas, 57 3/4 x 90 1/8 inches (146.7 x 229 cm). Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum, New York 54.1408. © 2012 The Pollock-Krasner Foundation/Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York
The critical debate that surrounded Abstract Expressionism during the late 1940s was embodied in the work of Jackson Pollock. Clement Greenberg, a leading critic and Pollock’s champion, professed that each discrete art form should, above all else, aspire to a demonstration of its own intrinsic properties and not encroach on the domains of other art forms. A successful painting, he believed, affirmed its inherent two-dimensionality and aimed toward complete abstraction. At the same time, however, the critic Harold Rosenberg was extolling the subjective quality of art; fervent brushstrokes were construed as expressions of an artist’s inner self, and the abstract canvas became a gestural theater of private passions. Pollock’s art—from the early, Surrealist-inspired figurative canvases and those invoking “primitive” archetypes to the later labyrinthine webs of poured paint—elicited both readings. Pollock’s reluctance to discuss his subject matter and his emphasis on the immediacy of the visual image contributed to shifting and, ultimately, dialectic views of his work.
In 1951, at the height of the artist’s career, Vogue magazine published fashion photographs by Cecil Beaton of models posing in front of Pollock’s drip paintings. Although this commercial recognition signaled public acceptance—and was symptomatic of mass culture’s inevitable expropriation of the avant-garde—Pollock continuously questioned the direction and reception of his art. His ambivalence about abstract painting, marked by a fear of being considered merely a “decorative” artist, was exacerbated, and it was around this time that he reintroduced to his paintings the quasi-figurative elements that he had abandoned when concentrating on the poured canvases. Ocean Greyness, one of Pollock’s last great works, depicts several disembodied eyes hidden within the swirling colored fragments that materialize from the dense, scumbled gray ground. “When you are painting out of your unconscious,” he claimed, “figures are bound to emerge.” Manifest in this painting is a dynamic tension between representation and abstraction that, finally, constitutes the core of Pollock’s multileveled oeuvre.
Nancy Spector


